RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege

BettingView Market Monitor

1. 30 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC

   As of 30 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC, BettingView compares 23 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.21 (Dafabet, 79%) and firming — 13 of 23 books shortened them while the Yes drift. On Yes, the best price (4.50) pays 25.0% more than the shortest (3.60). Highest payout: Dafabet, 95.4%. No held 1.17→1.17 (+0%) over 0h.

   Yes 4.50 (Dafabet) · No 1.21 (Dafabet)

2. 30 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC

   As of 30 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC, BettingView compares 44 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.23 (Bet3000, 78%) and firming — 33 of 44 books shortened them while the Yes drift. On Yes, the best price (4.30) pays 36.5% more than the shortest (3.15). Highest payout: Duelbits, 93.4%. No shortened 1.24→1.19 (-4.4%) over 9h (range 1.19–1.24).

   Yes 4.30 (Winamax DE) · No 1.23 (Bet3000)

3. 30 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC

   As of 30 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC, BettingView compares 37 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.23 (Bet3000, 77%) — but the market is drifting toward Yes, shortened at 18 of 37 books. On Yes, the best price (4.10) pays 30.2% more than the shortest (3.15). Highest payout: Duelbits, 93.5%. No shortened 1.24→1.19 (-4.4%) over 9h (range 1.19–1.24).

   Yes 4.10 (Winamax DE) · No 1.23 (Bet3000)

4. 30 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC

   As of 30 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC, BettingView compares 42 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.24 (Betano, 77%) and firming — 37 of 42 books shortened them while the Yes drift. On Yes, the best price (4.20) pays 33.3% more than the shortest (3.15). Highest payout: Duelbits, 93.8%. No shortened 1.24→1.21 (-2.4%) over 9h (range 1.21–1.24).

   Yes 4.20 (Winamax DE) · No 1.24 (Betano)

5. 30 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC

   As of 30 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC, BettingView compares 42 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.27 (Estrela Bet, 76%) and firming — 30 of 42 books shortened them while the Yes drift. On Yes, the best price (4.00) pays 31.1% more than the shortest (3.05). Highest payout: 888Sport, 93.4%. No shortened 1.24→1.22 (-1.5%) over 7h (range 1.22–1.24).

   Yes 4.00 (Winamax DE) · No 1.27 (Estrela Bet)

6. 26 Oct 2026, 18:39 UTC

   As of 26 Oct 2026, 18:39 UTC, BettingView compares 32 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.30 (BC.Game, 74%) — but the market is drifting toward Yes, shortened at 12 of 32 books. On Yes, the best price (3.75) pays 29.3% more than the shortest (2.90). Highest payout: Winamax DE, 93.1%. No drifted 1.24→1.26 (+1.6%) over 22h (range 1.24–1.26).

   Yes 3.75 (MaxBet RS) · No 1.30 (BC.Game)

7. 25 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTC

   As of 25 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTC, BettingView compares 2 bookmakers available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). No is favourite at a best 1.25 (Vave, 74%). On Yes, the best price (3.65) pays 5.8% more than the shortest (3.45). Highest payout: Winamax ES, 93.1%.

   Yes 3.65 (Winamax ES) · No 1.25 (Vave)

8. 25 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC

   As of 25 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC, BettingView has odds from 1 bookmaker available in Finland for the Team 2 To Score in Both Halves on RFC Seraing vs RFC Liege (Challenger Pro League, kickoff 19:00 UTC). Vave prices No 1.25 and Yes 3.45. No is the shortest price — an implied 73% chance.

   Yes 3.45 (Vave) · No 1.25 (Vave)